Canon 100-400mm vs 100-400mm II: Lens Showdown

Canon 100 400 vs 100 400 ii – Canon 100-400mm vs 100-400mm II: Lens Showdown – Stepping into the arena of telephoto zoom lenses, the Canon 100-400mm series stands as a formidable contender for wildlife and sports photographers. The introduction of the Canon 100-400mm II marked a significant evolution, boasting enhancements designed to elevate image quality, performance, and user experience.

This comprehensive comparison delves into the intricacies of these two lenses, dissecting their features, performance, and ultimately, their suitability for different photographic endeavors.

The Canon 100-400mm, first released in 2007, established itself as a reliable and versatile lens for capturing distant subjects. However, advancements in technology and user feedback paved the way for the Canon 100-400mm II, which arrived in 2014. This second iteration incorporated refinements in autofocus, image stabilization, and overall build quality, aiming to deliver a more refined and capable lens for discerning photographers.

Canon 100-400mm Lenses: A Comparison

The Canon 100-400mm lens series has been a staple for wildlife and sports photographers, offering a versatile focal range that captures distant subjects with impressive detail. The original Canon 100-400mm lens, released in 2007, was a groundbreaking offering, but the subsequent Canon 100-400mm II lens, released in 2014, brought significant improvements.

The Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS II USM is a significant upgrade from its predecessor, boasting improved autofocus, image stabilization, and a lighter build. However, if you’re looking for a lens with a more budget-friendly price tag, the original Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS USM might be a good option, especially if you’re a beginner or someone who wants to dabble in wildlife photography.

To ensure you’re getting a genuine lens, especially if you’re buying used, it’s essential to check the seller’s reputation. A helpful resource for verifying the authenticity of photography gear is is unique photo legit , which provides valuable information about potential scams and how to avoid them.

Ultimately, choosing between the Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS USM and its newer counterpart depends on your budget and photographic needs.

This comparison delves into the key differences between these two lenses, highlighting the advancements that make the second generation a worthy upgrade.

Evolution of the Canon 100-400mm Lens

The Canon 100-400mm II lens represents a significant advancement over its predecessor. It incorporates numerous improvements in optical performance, autofocus speed, and build quality. The lens is designed to deliver sharper images, faster autofocus, and enhanced durability, making it a compelling choice for professional and enthusiast photographers alike.

Key Features and Specifications

The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM and its predecessor, the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, are both popular telephoto zoom lenses designed for photographers who want to capture distant subjects. While they share a similar focal range and purpose, there are key differences in their features and specifications that make them suitable for different needs and photographic styles.

Focal Length and Aperture

The focal length of a lens determines its magnification power, while the aperture controls the amount of light entering the lens. Both the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM and the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM offer a versatile 100-400mm focal length range, making them suitable for a wide variety of subjects, from wildlife and sports to landscapes and portraits.

Both lenses have a maximum aperture of f/4.5 at the wide end (100mm) and f/5.6 at the telephoto end (400mm). This aperture range allows for a good balance between sharpness and depth of field.

Autofocus System and Performance

The autofocus system is crucial for capturing sharp images, especially when photographing fast-moving subjects. Both lenses feature a ring-type ultrasonic motor (USM) for fast and quiet autofocus.

The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM features an improved autofocus system with a new Nano USM motor that provides faster and more precise autofocus, particularly in low light and when tracking moving subjects. This new motor is specifically designed for smooth and silent focusing, making it suitable for both still and video photography.
The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM utilizes a traditional USM motor, which is still very capable, but may not be as fast or precise as the Nano USM motor in the newer lens.

Image Stabilization Technology

Image stabilization technology helps to reduce camera shake, allowing for sharper images, especially when shooting at longer focal lengths. Both lenses incorporate Canon’s renowned optical image stabilization technology, but the newer lens boasts a significant improvement.

The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM features a 4-stop image stabilization system, providing up to four stops of compensation for camera shake. This allows photographers to handhold the lens at slower shutter speeds without compromising image sharpness.
The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM has a 3-stop image stabilization system, which is still effective but not as robust as the newer lens.

Minimum Focusing Distance and Magnification

The minimum focusing distance determines how close the lens can focus to a subject, while magnification indicates the size of the subject in the frame.

The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM has a minimum focusing distance of 1.2 meters (3.9 feet) at the 100mm focal length and a maximum magnification of 0.25x. This allows for closer focusing and a larger subject size in the frame.
The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM has a minimum focusing distance of 1.3 meters (4.3 feet) at the 100mm focal length and a maximum magnification of 0.21x.

Image Quality Comparison: Canon 100 400 Vs 100 400 Ii

The Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS USM and the Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS II USM are both renowned telephoto zoom lenses designed for capturing wildlife, sports, and other distant subjects. While they share similar specifications, there are notable differences in their image quality performance.

The Canon 100-400mm II boasts impressive autofocus and image stabilization, making it a popular choice for wildlife and sports photography. However, for everyday use, a versatile prime lens might be a better fit. Choosing the best prime for daily use depends on your subject matter and shooting style.

While the Canon 100-400mm II is excellent for capturing distant action, a prime lens often offers superior sharpness and a wider aperture for low-light situations, making it a more adaptable choice for daily photography.

This section will delve into a detailed comparison of the image quality produced by these lenses, focusing on sharpness, resolution, chromatic aberration, distortion, bokeh, and overall image rendering.

Sharpness and Resolution

Sharpness and resolution are crucial aspects of image quality, determining the level of detail captured by the lens.

The Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS II USM lens boasts a significant upgrade over its predecessor, featuring improved image stabilization and autofocus performance. This makes it an excellent choice for wildlife photography, but it’s crucial to consider the camera body that will pair with it.

When deciding between the Nikon Z6 II and Sony a7 III, factors like autofocus system, image quality, and ergonomics come into play. nikon z6ii vs sony a7iii Ultimately, the choice between the Canon 100-400mm II and the camera body depends on your individual needs and preferences, but both the Nikon Z6 II and Sony a7 III offer impressive capabilities for wildlife photography.

The Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS II USM generally outperforms its predecessor in terms of sharpness, particularly at the longer focal lengths. The advancements in lens design and construction contribute to improved image clarity and detail rendition.
At wide-open apertures, both lenses exhibit good sharpness in the center of the frame, but the Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS II USM demonstrates better corner sharpness, especially at the longer end of the zoom range. This improvement is attributed to the inclusion of a new aspherical lens element in the optical design of the newer lens.
Stopping down to f/8 or f/11 generally yields optimal sharpness across the entire frame for both lenses. However, the Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS II USM maintains a slight edge in sharpness and detail rendition even at these apertures.

Performance and Handling

The Canon 100-400mm lenses, both the original and the Mark II, are renowned for their performance and handling. However, the Mark II model boasts several improvements that make it a more refined and user-friendly option. This section delves into the specifics of autofocus performance, build quality, focusing ring and zoom ring experience, and ergonomics, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each lens.

Autofocus Speed and Accuracy

The autofocus performance of both lenses is impressive, especially when considering their reach. The Canon 100-400mm Mark II, however, benefits from a faster and more accurate autofocus system, thanks to the inclusion of a newer, more powerful autofocus motor. This translates to quicker acquisition and tracking of moving subjects, particularly in low light conditions.

The Mark II also features a more advanced autofocus algorithm, which contributes to its improved accuracy.

Canon 100-400mm:The original lens utilizes a ring-type USM motor, which provides decent autofocus speeds. However, it can struggle to keep up with fast-moving subjects, especially in low light. The autofocus accuracy is generally good, but it may exhibit some hunting behavior at longer focal lengths.
Canon 100-400mm Mark II:The Mark II features a more advanced Nano USM motor, which delivers significantly faster and more accurate autofocus. It can effortlessly track even the fastest-moving subjects, thanks to its improved responsiveness and precision. The autofocus algorithm in the Mark II is also optimized for better accuracy and reduced hunting.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing

Both lenses are constructed with high-quality materials and boast durable build quality. The Canon 100-400mm Mark II, however, takes the lead with its improved weather sealing. The Mark II features a more robust weather-resistant design, with additional seals around the lens barrel and lens mount.

This enhanced sealing makes it more resistant to dust, moisture, and splashes, allowing photographers to confidently use it in challenging weather conditions.

Canon 100-400mm:The original lens features a decent build quality, with a magnesium alloy construction and a weather-resistant design. However, its weather sealing is not as robust as the Mark II, and it may not withstand heavy rain or harsh environments.
Canon 100-400mm Mark II:The Mark II boasts an even more robust build quality, with a more substantial feel and a more extensive weather sealing. The lens is sealed at several points, including the lens mount, zoom ring, and focusing ring, providing excellent protection against the elements.
This makes it a more reliable option for photographers who often shoot in challenging weather conditions.

Focusing Ring and Zoom Ring Experience

Both lenses feature smooth and responsive focusing and zoom rings. However, the Canon 100-400mm Mark II boasts a slightly improved focusing ring experience, with a more tactile feel and a wider range of rotation. This makes it easier to fine-tune focus with precision, especially when shooting at longer focal lengths.

The zoom ring on both lenses is smooth and easy to operate, allowing for effortless adjustments during shooting.

The Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS II USM lens boasts improved image stabilization and autofocus performance over its predecessor, the Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS USM. This enhanced performance is particularly relevant when paired with a full-frame camera like the Canon 6D Mark II, known for its impressive low-light capabilities.

To make an informed decision on whether the 6D Mark II is the right camera for your needs, check out this comprehensive comparison: canon 6d mark ii vs. Ultimately, the choice between the Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS USM and the Canon 100-400mm f/5.6L IS II USM lens depends on your specific photography needs and budget.

Canon 100-400mm:The original lens features a smooth focusing ring with a comfortable grip. However, it can feel slightly stiff at times, especially when adjusting focus at longer focal lengths. The zoom ring is smooth and responsive, allowing for effortless adjustments.
Canon 100-400mm Mark II:The Mark II features a slightly wider focusing ring with a more tactile feel, providing better control and precision during focusing. The zoom ring remains smooth and responsive, offering a comfortable and reliable experience.

Handling and Ergonomics

Both lenses are relatively large and heavy, which is expected given their reach. The Canon 100-400mm Mark II, however, features a slightly more balanced design and a more comfortable grip, thanks to its redesigned lens barrel and a more pronounced zoom ring.

This makes it more comfortable to handle for extended periods, especially when shooting handheld. The Mark II also features a more ergonomic lens hood, which provides better protection for the front element and improves handling.

Canon 100-400mm:The original lens can feel slightly front-heavy, which can make it challenging to handle for extended periods, especially when shooting handheld. The lens hood is functional but lacks the ergonomic design of the Mark II.
Canon 100-400mm Mark II:The Mark II features a more balanced design and a more comfortable grip, thanks to its redesigned lens barrel and a more pronounced zoom ring. The lens hood is also more ergonomic, providing better protection and improving handling.

Target Users and Applications

The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM and its predecessor, the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, are versatile telephoto zoom lenses designed for various photographic applications. They cater to a wide range of photographers, from wildlife and sports enthusiasts to general photographers seeking to capture distant subjects with clarity and detail.

Best Use Cases

The following table Artikels the best use cases for each lens based on photography style and subject matter:| Lens | Photography Style | Subject Matter ||—|—|—|| Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM | Wildlife Photography | Birds in flight, animals in their natural habitat, distant wildlife || Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM | Sports Photography | Action shots, motorsports, track and field events || Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM | General Photography | Landscape photography, travel photography, architectural photography || Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM | Wildlife Photography | Birds in flight, animals in their natural habitat, distant wildlife || Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM | Sports Photography | Action shots, motorsports, track and field events || Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM | General Photography | Landscape photography, travel photography, architectural photography |

Suitability for Wildlife Photography

Both the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM and its predecessor are well-suited for wildlife photography. The long focal length range allows photographers to capture distant subjects with detail, while the image stabilization system helps to minimize camera shake, resulting in sharper images.

The fast autofocus system enables photographers to track moving subjects effectively, ensuring they capture those decisive moments.

Suitability for Sports Photography

These lenses are also popular choices for sports photography. The long focal length range allows photographers to capture action shots from a distance, while the fast autofocus system helps to track moving athletes with precision. The image stabilization system helps to ensure sharp images, even when shooting handheld.

Suitability for General Photography

Beyond wildlife and sports, these lenses are also versatile enough for general photography applications. The long focal length range can be used to capture distant landscapes, architectural details, and travel scenes. The image quality and sharpness of these lenses make them suitable for a wide range of photographic styles.

The Canon 100-400mm II boasts superior image stabilization and autofocus, making it a prime choice for capturing those fleeting moments of senior year. The enhanced clarity and reach of the lens are particularly helpful for capturing dynamic outdoor portraits, like those found in senior pictures outdoor ideas , where natural light and expansive backgrounds are key.

For the aspiring photographer who wants to capture their senior year in stunning detail, the Canon 100-400mm II offers an undeniable advantage over its predecessor.

Examples of Photographers and Their Experiences

Numerous photographers have utilized these lenses for their work, capturing stunning images in various genres. For instance, renowned wildlife photographer, [Photographer Name], has used the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM to capture breathtaking images of birds in flight and animals in their natural habitat.

His work has been featured in prestigious publications and exhibitions, showcasing the lens’s capabilities in capturing detail and sharpness.Similarly, sports photographer [Photographer Name], has relied on the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM to capture fast-paced action shots at various sporting events.

His images, known for their clarity and sharpness, have been published in major sports magazines and newspapers, demonstrating the lens’s ability to track moving subjects with precision.

Price and Value

The price of a lens is a significant factor for photographers, especially when considering high-end telephoto lenses like the Canon 100-400mm series. This section will compare the current market prices of the Canon 100-400mm and 100-400mm II lenses and discuss the value proposition of each lens in terms of price and performance.

It will also analyze the potential return on investment for photographers considering these lenses.

Current Market Prices, Canon 100 400 vs 100 400 ii

The price difference between the Canon 100-400mm and 100-400mm II lenses is significant. The original Canon 100-400mm lens is generally available at a much lower price point, making it a more affordable option for photographers on a budget. However, the Canon 100-400mm II lens, while significantly more expensive, offers a number of improvements in terms of image quality, performance, and handling.

The price difference can be attributed to several factors, including the technological advancements in the newer model, the demand for the lens, and the availability of used or refurbished units.

As of [Date], the Canon 100-400mm lens is available for around [Price range] on popular online marketplaces and retailers.
The Canon 100-400mm II lens, on the other hand, is priced significantly higher, typically ranging from [Price range] on average.

Value Proposition

The value proposition of each lens depends on the individual photographer’s needs and budget.

For photographers who are just starting out or have a limited budget, the original Canon 100-400mm lens can be a great value proposition. It offers good image quality and performance at a relatively affordable price.
For professional photographers or those who demand the best possible image quality and performance, the Canon 100-400mm II lens is a better investment. Its improved optical performance, faster autofocus, and weather sealing make it a more reliable and versatile tool for professional use.

Return on Investment

The potential return on investment for photographers considering these lenses depends on how often they use the lens and the type of photography they do.

For photographers who frequently use a telephoto lens for wildlife, sports, or other types of action photography, the Canon 100-400mm II lens can be a valuable investment. Its improved performance can lead to sharper images and a higher success rate, which can translate into more sales or higher client satisfaction.
For photographers who only occasionally use a telephoto lens, the original Canon 100-400mm lens may be a more cost-effective option. It still offers good image quality and performance for casual use.

Conclusion

The Canon 100-400mm and 100-400mm II lenses are both exceptional telephoto zoom lenses designed for capturing distant subjects with clarity and detail. They share many core features and capabilities, but the second generation lens offers significant improvements in image quality, autofocus performance, and build quality.

Key Differences and Similarities

The Canon 100-400mm II lens boasts a redesigned optical formula, featuring a new Fluorite element that effectively reduces chromatic aberration, resulting in sharper and more accurate images. Additionally, the lens incorporates a new, faster autofocus system, leveraging a ring-type USM motor and a higher-density focusing group.

This translates to quicker and more precise autofocus performance, particularly when tracking fast-moving subjects. The 100-400mm II lens also benefits from improved build quality, with a weather-sealed construction that offers greater protection against the elements.

Optical Formula:The 100-400mm II lens features a new optical formula with a Fluorite element for improved chromatic aberration correction, resulting in sharper images.
Autofocus Performance:The 100-400mm II lens boasts a faster and more precise autofocus system thanks to a ring-type USM motor and a higher-density focusing group.
Build Quality:The 100-400mm II lens has improved build quality, with a weather-sealed construction for greater protection against the elements.
Image Stabilization:Both lenses feature image stabilization, but the 100-400mm II lens offers improved image stabilization, allowing for sharper handheld shots at slower shutter speeds.
Weight and Size:The 100-400mm II lens is slightly heavier and larger than the original 100-400mm lens.

Lens Recommendations

The choice between the Canon 100-400mm and 100-400mm II lenses depends on individual needs and priorities.

For budget-conscious photographers:The original Canon 100-400mm lens remains a capable and affordable option, offering excellent image quality and performance for a lower price.
For professional photographers and enthusiasts seeking the best possible image quality and performance:The Canon 100-400mm II lens is the superior choice, delivering exceptional sharpness, fast autofocus, and a robust build.
For photographers who prioritize weight and portability:The original Canon 100-400mm lens is slightly lighter and more compact, making it a better option for travel and wildlife photography where weight is a concern.
For photographers who require superior weather sealing:The Canon 100-400mm II lens is the preferred choice, offering enhanced weather resistance for use in challenging environments.

Wrap-Up

The Canon 100-400mm and 100-400mm II lenses represent distinct stages in the evolution of telephoto zoom technology. The original 100-400mm remains a capable option for those seeking a reliable and affordable lens, while the 100-400mm II offers a significant upgrade in performance and features, making it a compelling choice for professionals and enthusiasts alike.

Ultimately, the choice between these two lenses boils down to individual needs, budget, and photographic aspirations.